I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. You are free to comment as you wish. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. log out. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. Interviews with scientists and authors, animated bits, and a storyline involving a deaf photographer are used in this docudrama to illustrate the link between quantum mechanics, neurobiology, human consciousness and day-to-day reality. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. based on this subject nature contained, I hold these 2 films in a very high regard. "What the bleep. to someone you know:
In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. extrapolates from quantum physics to answer life's big questions. Joe Dispenza Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. "If thoughts can do that to water, imagine what our thoughts can do to us" observed a fan of Dr Masaru Emoto in the movie. It was really hard to sit through. Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. At the end of this article, Dr Simons invites readers to explore the limitations of their own brains. You can renew your subscription or Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. There was some sort of plot involving a woman photographer (played by Marlee Matlin), who wanders around and has anxiety attacks. 8. Even skeptics concede that we humans can fall into destructive thought patterns and need to cleanse our vision of what's real. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). D (k)ow!? Dr Joao Migueijo is reader in theoretical physics at Imperial College, London.What the Bleep Do We Know!? And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. Prominent if you go by citations that is. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? The observer can't be ignored." That's its claim anyway. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. 3. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. have described distinct assertions made as pseudoscience. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. [2]. Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. (It's all to do with photons of light from your measuring instrument hitting the poor electron and knocking it for six). If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. It's certainly not. That's what makes the world so interesting. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. What the Bleep Do We Know!? The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. logged you out. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." . is a 2004 American pseudo-scientific film that posits a spiritual connection between quantum physics and consciousness. That sounds like magic. Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. Cast. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. Moreover, assume that they want your money. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. IE 11 is not supported. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". What the Bleep Do We Know? Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. 7. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. And wait-the human body is mostly water! What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? Featuring two (!) "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. What was new? Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . [1], The films co-director, Mark Vicente, would go on to co-found The Knife Media, a pro-Trump digital news outlet linked to NXIVM. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. So when you hear about quantum mechanics and devices, you can say, "OK, that sounds reasonable." "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. That's why we experience a classical world. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. "What The Bleep Do We Know? so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. The brain wasn't born yesterday. - Dr. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. Somehow the main character of the movie was learning these amazing facts about quantum physics, and this then helps her deal with her anxiety attacks, bad body image and sex addiction (the film really goes off the rails in a bizarre scene where she is the photographer at a wedding party that turns into a grotesque kind of orgy). One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. contact customer service By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. I am glad that someone else thought that that movie was a bunch of garbage. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. A lot of the propaganda from them was hilarious, especially whenever candidates attempted to hold public speeches and performing demonstrations of yogic flying. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). Film / What the #$*! If he says hes being misrepresented, I quite believe him. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. Our work isn't possible without your support. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message".
Is Soozie Tyrell Married,
Elton John Tickets Cleveland,
Alan Ladd Death Photos,
Articles W